Senior Fellow in Law and Policy at the Center for Cognitive Liberty & Ethics
Pro to the question "Should Marijuana Be a Medical Option?"
"Medical marijuana is controversial for one reason; namely, as part and parcel of its beneficial medicinal properties, the plant produces a mild shift in consciousness that many people find enjoyable, beneficial, and in some cases spiritual. Under well-established legal principles related to intellectual freedom, freedom of thought, freedom of expression, and privacy, the government is not permitted to restrain the manner or mode in which a person thinks...
Concerns related to the psychoactive effects of marijuana (when used for medicine or otherwise) are not only misplaced, such concerns are contrary to law in light of our nation’s abiding respect for individual liberty and freedom of thought...
To the extent that states are determined to retain their general criminal prohibitions concerning marijuana, a medical accommodation or exemption is necessary as an act of compassion for sick and injured people, and to conform state law to recent scientific and medical findings showing the medical efficacy of marijuana."
"Medical Marijuana & Cognitive Liberty: First Amendment Implications of Marijuana Legislation," Center for Cognitive Liberty & Ethics, Feb. 27, 2003
Experts PhD's and JD's (lawyers) with significant post-doctoral involvement in medical marijuana issues; judges who have presided over medical marijuana cases. [Note: Experts definition varies by site.]
Involvement and Affiliations:
Founder, RGB Law Group, 2007-present
Senior Fellow in Law and Policy, Center for Cognitive Liberty & Ethics, 2004-present
Founder and Attorney, Law Firm of Richard Glen Boire, 1990-present
Editor, Entheogen Law Reporter, 1993-2008
Co-Chair, Center for Cognitive Liberty & Ethics, 1999-2004
Translator, Salvia Divinorum Growers Guide, 1998
Member, National Association for the Reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML) Legal Committee