Director of the Drug Policy Institute at the University of Florida
Con to the question "Should Marijuana Be a Medical Option?"
"The CMA [California Medical Association] has decided that the solution is completely to legalize marijuana for all purposes, both medical and recreational, and then study it. But this is backwards. With no other modern medication have we taken this approach. Can you imagine if we made some new psychoactive substance -- say Spice, K-2, or 'bath salts'-- fully legal before researching it?...
Furthermore, the raw marijuana plant material -- itself containing hundreds of unknown components -- has not met FDA's standards of safety and efficacy...
[W]e don't smoke opium to reap the benefits of morphine, nor do we chew willow bark to receive the effects of aspirin. Similarly, we should not have to smoke marijuana to get potential therapeutic effects from its components.
[M]edical marijuana as it stands today, in California and many other states, has turned into a sad joke. A recent study found that the average 'patient' was a 32-year-old white male with a history of drug and alcohol abuse and no history of a life-threatening disease...
Real medications must be fully studied, then approved by the FDA, then made available to patients by prescription."
"California Medical Association's Decision Not Based on Public Health," Huffington Post, Oct. 21, 2011
Experts PhD's and JD's (lawyers) with significant post-doctoral involvement in medical marijuana issues; judges who have presided over medical marijuana cases. [Note: Experts definition varies by site.]
Involvement and Affiliations:
Director, Drug Policy Institute, University of Florida
Assistant Professor, University of Florida College of Medicine, Division of Addiction Medicine, Department of Psychiatry
President, Policy Solutions Lab
Senior Policy Advisor, Office of National Drug Control Policy, The White House, Executive Office of the President, 2009-2011