Medical Marijuana
Pros and Cons
Video exploring critical thinking and how it leads to great citizen involvement
Should Marijuana Be a Medical Option?
medical marijuana
In 1972, the US Congress placed marijuana in Schedule I of the Controlled Substances Act because they considered it to have "no accepted medical use." Since then, 23 of 50 US states and DC have legalized the medical use of marijuana.

Proponents of medical marijuana argue that it can be a safe and effective treatment for the symptoms of cancer, AIDS, multiple sclerosis, pain, glaucoma, epilepsy, and other conditions. They cite dozens of peer-reviewed studies, prominent medical organizations, major government reports, and the use of marijuana as medicine throughout world history.

Opponents of medical marijuana argue that it is too dangerous to use, lacks FDA-approval, and that various legal drugs make marijuana use unnecessary. They say marijuana is addictive, leads to harder drug use, interferes with fertility, impairs driving ability, and injures the lungs, immune system, and brain. They say that medical marijuana is a front for drug legalization and recreational use.


Core Question
Top 10 Pros & Cons
Did You Know?
Historical Timeline
Comments


[Note: We do not provide referrals to or recommendations of marijuana dispensaries, cannabis clubs, physicians, or attorneys although we do reference them on this website.]
Medical Marijuana ProCon.org is a nonpartisan, nonprofit website that presents research, studies, and pro and con statements on questions related to whether or not marijuana should be a medical option.

Pros & Cons by Category
CORE QUESTION
Medical Value
Diseases / Conditions
Non-Smoked Marijuana
Public Policy
Risks
US Government and Medical Marijuana
Access to Medical Marijuana
Legal Issues
Chemical Composition of Marijuana
Adopt the Medical Marijuana site and support ProCon.org

Share your thoughts on medical marijuana and read, vote on, and reply to existing comments. Join the debate.

Teacher Survey

Notices for Medical Marijuana and Other ProCon.org Information (archived after 30 days)

9/10/2014  NEW ProCon.org Website! – Should students have to wear school uniforms? - Our 51st website explores the pros and cons in the debate over mandatory school uniforms. Almost one in five US public schools required students to wear uniforms during the 2011-2012 school year, up from one in eight in 2003-2004. Proponents say that school uniforms make schools safer for students, create a "level playing field" that reduces socioeconomic disparities, and encourage children to focus on their studies rather than their clothes. Opponents say school uniforms infringe upon students' right to express their individuality, have no positive effect on behavior and academic achievement, and emphasize the socioeconomic disparities they are intended to disguise.

Archived Notices (archived after 30 days)


Last updated on 9/8/2014 2:41:13 PM PST

Please enter a valid email address to continue.
Privacy Policy Do not show again.
Visit the ProCon.org community on:

© 2014 ProCon.org, a 501(c)(3) nonprofit     |   233 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 200, Santa Monica, CA 90401    |    Tel: 310-451-9596   




Hide/Show